» View all
»Time To Simplify and Get Organized (Well, At Least Your Cloud Services)
The practice of adding cloud services in silos and based on specific department needs often results in overlapping and many different contracts with the same vendors.
»Riding the Waves of Healthcare Risk
The modern healthcare system is much like the ocean—stormy, choppy, and hostile at times, soothing, calm and inviting at others. For surfers, the more waves you go for, the more you will catch, and the more likely you’ll “wipe-out.”
»The Department of Defense Wants a New Mantra
“Do more with less.” It’s become a tired refrain that U.S. Department of Defense leadership is all too familiar with hearing from all directions, whether it is their direct superiors, Congress, or the Executive.
»Things Go Wrong
Things go wrong. Anyone who plays poker knows this. One moment you’re on the verge of a royal flush, and the next, you pull a six of diamonds, and you’re called. Things do indeed go wrong.
»The Next Big Thing
Consultants are always looking for the next big thing, the innovation that will see clients storming through their gates, bypassing pesky procurement departments, and writing blank checks for the magic mousetrap that whitens and brightens and cleans windows, too.
»JP Morgan and The Whale: A Parable
After a tumultuous period of banking hyper-regulation after 2008, no one would have suspected in 2012 that JP Morgan, the world’s largest bank, had ineffective controls in place that left the company flat-footed when its “rogue” trader had taken untenable, long-term positions on Credit Default Swaps.
» View all
»Marriott Goes Big in NYC
Marriott International, Inc. and G Holdings opened what they’re calling an “iconic addition” to the New York skyline, a combined 378-room Courtyard hotel and 261-suite Residence Inn hotel in midtown Manhattan. The $320 million, 68-story property is the tallest single-use hotel in North America.
»Best Places to Stay: Travel Bounces Back
Consultants are on the road again, at least according to the results of our annual Best Places to Stay survey.
»FAA: ‘Staffing Challenges’ Causing Delays
In case you haven’t noticed, non-weather related delays at U.S. airports are on the rise. (And I know you’ve noticed that weather-related delays are definitely on the rise.)
»Hilton’s Building Boom
Coming off a whirlwind 2012, Hilton Worldwide is the fastest growing global hospitality company by number of rooms.
» View all
»Excerpt: Procurement as Productivity
The following is an excerpt from the book Procurement 20/20: Supply Entrepreneurship in a Changing World by a quartet of McKinsey & Company consultants—Peter Spiller, Nicolas Reinecke, Drew Ungerman and Henrique Teixera.
»Review: The Risk-Driven Business Model
Most companies focus their innovation on new products.
»Review: Lead Positive
Today’s business leaders face intense pressure to deliver results in an uncertain, chaotic, and high-stress business environment.
»Review: Step Up
No matter what your title or place in the organization chart, you have the potential to be a leader.
»The Three Rules
Earlier this year, Deloitte Consulting’s Mumtaz Ahmed and Michael Raynor published The Three Rules: How Exceptional Companies Think. The authors set out to answer what was, in their mind, the ultimate business question—how do some companies achieve exceptional performance over the long haul?
»Thinking in New Boxes
Creativity is key if you are to thrive in a time of accelerating change, according to The Boston Consulting Group’s Luc De Brabandere and Alan Iny.
Best Firms To Work For
»The 2011 Best Firms to Work For
Despite an improved economy, reinvestment in training and an uptick in compensation, consultants are less content with their jobs than they were a year ago. What follows is an exclusive Best Firms to Work For Special Section highlighting the survey’s major findings from the more than 13,000 respondents representing some 350 firms.
By Jess Scheer
Does consulting have a crisis of confidence?
After reviewing the results of our exclusive Best Firms to Work For and Best Small Firms to Work survey, it would appear so. One of the main findings of the survey is confidence levels fell in five of the six facets of employee satisfaction in 2011 as measured by Consulting
magazine’s annual rankings.
The lone exception was compensation satisfaction, which essentially stagnated (up slightly from 4.00 to 4.01 on a 5-point scale). More than 13,000 consultants completed the survey, the profession’s largest independent analysis of employee satisfaction.
As a result of the underlying causes of employee disengagement, consulting firms should anticipate high voluntary turnover for the foreseeable future, especially among junior-level staff. Within four years, the majority of pre-partners say they intend to defect (73 percent of entry level/analysts, 66 percent of consultant/recent MBAs, 55 percent of senior/experienced consultants and 46 percent of director/managers.)
What’s more, those numbers likely represent a best-case scenario. Based on our experience tracking consulting retention for the past eleven years, Consulting
has learned that once someone places a clock on their tenure at a firm by saying “I don’t think I’ll still be working here in x year(s),” they’ll often end up leaving much faster than they initially anticipate. They’re much more susceptible to the cold call from the executive recruiter, the employment inquiry by a client or the friend who has long considered opening up her own firm.
The other reason the data represents a best-case scenario is that it’s only based on feedback from consultants that think they may work for a “Best Firm.” In other words, the approximately 350 firms represented in this data are, by default, likely among the top half of all firms, when ranked by employee satisfaction. Firm leaders at firms where morale and culture is palatably low should anticipate far higher anticipated attrition levels.
But even among the top firms included in this analysis, the high anticipated attrition rates are problematic because they come despite significant investments intended to improve employees’ experience inside their firms. Most notably:
- Morale has climbed two consecutive years and is now higher than it was before the downturn.
- The average consultant worked an hour less per week in 2011 than in 2010, ending a six-year span of incremental increases in workload.
- The average number of training hours increased by more than 12 percent in 2011; the average number of training hours had declined the last two years.
- Compensation is up across the board: Almost 80 percent of consultants reported that their base salary increased in 2011, including almost 30 percent that reported double-digit raises.
The biggest takeaway from the survey may be that employee satisfaction, especially among highly employable consultants, is not something that can be turned off and then on again. Once trust has been broken, it takes more than a raise and a reinvestment in staff training to rekindle consultants’ desire to stay at their current firm.
Firm leaders that think their staff will remain loyal because they’re treating them better now may be in for a surprise.Losing consultants at the rate anticipated by these survey results is particularly problematic for three reasons:
- Coming out of the downturn, many firms are operating lean—having resorted to layoffs during the worst of the recession and conducting only limited hiring thus far through the recovery. Moreover, the downturn forced firms to weed out underperformers in low-demand areas, meaning that those that would leave now would be top performers who possess the most in-demand skills.
- Firms are already understaffed at the pre-partner level. During the prior downturn (2001 to 2004), firms cut staff disproportionately from the bottom of the pyramid and did very little campus hiring. When the economy recovered in late 2004, voluntary attrition was highest among the lowest ranks. Fast forward seven to ten years and many of those who were let go, never hired, or left the profession during the prior recovery would now be at least managers/directors. A second spike in defections now would exacerbate an already challenging leverage model.
- Hiring experienced talent is an increasingly difficult proposition. First, talent is scarce for the reasons sited above. Second, relatively few consultants (27 percent) say they have interest in re-entering the profession, indicating consultants are projecting all consulting firms with the negative traits experienced at their current firm. Those at the senior-most staff levels are the least likely to anticipate that their next career move will be to another consulting firm.
Despite these broad challenges reported in the aggregate, there are notable exceptions. The following pages profile 15 Best Firms to Work For and the 15 Best Small Firms to Work For. Each firm has a unique story to share, a best practice worth considering, and a lesson or two to be learned and even implemented at your firm.
| Definition of the Consulting Service Lines Used in the Best Firms to Work For Survey
| Few firms’ consulting services fit exclusively in a single service and the categorization below should not be read as suggesting these firms only provide services within that one bucket. Instead, the grouping is an attempt to compare firms in natural peer groups based on the service line from which the bulk of their revenue is generated.
| Financial Advisory Services
Financial and risk advisory services that reduce risk exposure for clients through assuring and justifying business decisions, assuring regulatory compliance and supporting the identification, reduction and management of business risk.
| IT Consulting
Consulting services aimed at improving business performance through leveraging technology in processes and decision making.
Consulting services that blend one or more of the above service lines.
| Operations Management
Consulting services that improve the effectiveness of the client’s value chain, including each of the major processes in client operations.
Consulting services intended to improve the long-term growth prospects of a company and the capabilities to enable that growth.
| Human Resources
Consulting services aimed at managing the employee "lifecycle," consulting around the people component of change management.
| What Makes a 'Best Firm'?
| To be named a Best Firm to Work For, firms were ranked in six categories. Each measures a different aspect of employee satisfaction, and each poses its own challenges in today’s market environment. The following describes the issues at play within each category.
|| Work/Life Balance
This category reflects how well consultants perceive their firm as enabling them to balance their life outside of their day job. Given the heavy work and travel regiment required, this is a difficult task. But understanding which firms handle this challenge can go a long way to identifying true employers of choice.
| Client Engagement
This category reflects the quality of work consultants perceive their firm is doing. It is not a measure of the actual work being done, but the more valuable a firm’s consultants perceives their work to be, the more engaged they tend to be in their client’s—and firm’s—success.
| Compensation & Benefits
This category reflects consultants’ satisfaction with their compensation and non-cash benefits and does not necessarily reflect which firms pay the most. The happier consultants are with their job, the more they’re willing to settle for making less. Such is the case with consultants from smaller firms who continue to report higher satisfaction despite smaller paychecks. But when consultants are unhappy, this category tends to be the easy scapegoat for their frustrations.
| Firm Culture
Firm culture reflects the shared values, standards, ethics, and goals of a firm. Gone are the days when firms would hire a generation of future partners from a leading campus and hone their skills and ethos over the course of a career. Today’s firms are comprised of talent that has spent years at other firms, and in other industries. Building and sustaining a strong culture, despite the lack of homogony in background and life experiences, becomes all the more difficult.
| Firm Leadership
Economic uncertainty tests leadership in big ways. The layoffs of 2009 tested their decision-making and internal communication skills. In 2010, leadership had to chart a new course and generate confidence in the firm’s direction. The more confidence the rank and file consultants have in their leaders, the more apt they are to be happy at their firm. But the opposite is also true.
| Career Development
The campus pipeline is just starting to be refilled this year, which will force some promotions up through the higher staffing levels. However, setting and communicating those goals is a challenge. Handling it well can make consultants want to stay with your firm longer; doing it poorly can encourage defections.
How (Dis)Content Are My Consultants?Consulting
| Who Took the Survey?
| The Best Firms to Work For rankings are based on an online survey conducted in the summer of 2011. More than 13,000 consultants participated, representing approximately 350 firms. The consultants operate in every service line, across at least 32 different project/practice areas, and serve clients across all major industries. About three-quarters of the respondents came from the United States. Consultants at every staff level participated. Below is a breakdown of participants, by staff level.
magazine’s Best Firms data does two things no internal employee satisfaction can do: 1) as an independent third party we garner more candid feedback from your consultants than they might otherwise share with an internal survey or 360 degree feedback program; and, 2) we can compare and benchmark your firm’s
employee satisfaction to that of your peers or competitors.
While we would never share your firm’s data with another firm, or vice versa, we can aggregate a custom peer set and provide a side-by-side comparison versus your firm, split by staff level, practice area, geographic office, or however would best fit your needs.
We also offer off-the-shelf reports identifying and quantifying which of 18 different facets of employee satisfaction best motivate consultants to want to stay with their current firm longer (and what specifically motivates consultants to want to defect sooner). The data is split by staff level within each service line. This report series is especially helpful in determining where to focus investment in your retention programs.
In addition, Consulting
magazine is proud to be partnering with Dick Finnegan, CEO of C-Suite Analytics, a leader in staff retention advisory services. His work over the last several decades has resulted in lowering staff turnover by as much as 70 percent.