NEWS BRIEFINGS
NYSE Cites BearingPoint for Noncompliance
(July 22, 2008) - McLean, VA
Unisys May Back Out of Philadelphia Move
(July 21, 2008) - Philadelphia, PA
New Job Board Specifically Targets Consultants
(July 18, 2008) - Washington, D.C.
e-newsletter
FEATURED
WHITE PAPER
RANKINGS
INTERVIEWS
MOST EMAILED ARTICLES
DEPARTMENTS
UPCOMING EVENTS
 »  Home  »  Rankings  »  Best Firms to Work For  »  The Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - Defining Talent
 »  Home  »  Articles  »  Feature  »  The Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - Defining Talent
Category:   The Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - Defining Talent
By Inés Peschiera | Published  11/17/2006 | Best Firms to Work For , Feature
 CommentPost Comment  

The first time the word “talent” was used to refer to a skill or ability, historians tell us, was in the New Testament. Before then, a talent was known as a unit of mass, which was often used to measure a sum of money. The English poet, John Milton, who is responsible for coining modern words such as “self-esteem” and “jubilant,” later used it in a poem referring to the gift of sight. Today, in the world of consulting, it has acquired yet another meaning.

In consulting, the word often denotes a type of individual or a group of individuals with certain characteristics. Talent is what consulting firms are moving mountains to attract. In a basic sense, the word refers to individuals who have a series of key characteristics that enable them to think creatively and work well in groups. Yes, a weighty degree from a top university or MBA program might suggest that an individual holds these qualities. But really, it’s about possessing the right mix of attributes, which are as elusive as those that make up the proverbial “it” factor in show business.

Every consultant has a different definition of the “it” factor. For Mike Pegler, a director at PRTM, the “it” denotes people who “have a track record of delivering results … and are very entrepreneurial.” For Zach Fox, an associate consultant at Bain & Company, this means having “a passion toward getting to an answer … and being very excited about what you are doing.” For Bruce Holley, a vice president at The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), these are individuals who “are very bright and can handle ambiguity.”

Chances are, “it” is a combination of these things, and if you have it, you are talent and will soon find — if you haven’t already — that the consulting world is a shopper’s market.

Luckily, the results of Consulting Magazine’s  “Best Firms to Work For” survey reveal an overwhelming amount of detail about the kinds of demands talent can expect to make, and precisely how firms are acquiescing.


Data Center




The 10 Best Firms
to Work For, 2006

Consulting Magazine's Best Firms to Work For, 2006
Click chart to view how
firms compared on 6 categories





Who gets the most training?

Consulting Magazine
Click chart to enlarge





How Training is Delivered

Consulting Magazine's 10 Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - How Training is Delivered
Click chart to enlarge





How often does your firm
meet its clients' needs?


Consulting Magazine's 10 Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - How Often does your firm meet its clients' needs?
Click chart to enlarge





Which firms have low
workforce turnover?


Consulting Magazine's 10 Best Firms to Work For, 2006 - Which firms have low workforce turnover?
Click chart to enlarge








Click here to access  data center >>

Perhaps unlike in any other age in consulting, the current market for talent is leading firms to invigorate their talent models, and nowhere is this more evident than inside those firms now counted on our annual “Best Firms to Work For” list. Resulting from input from more than 5,000 consultants this year, our “Best Firms to Work For” ranking once again provides a unique view into the consulting world’s talent marketplace, signaling the rise of hot new talent shops such as Point B of Seattle and Huron Consulting of Chicago. Moreover, the list signals a different distinction for those firms whose names no longer appear on it (such as, perhaps most notably, Booz Allen Hamilton, which this year dropped off the list after having made it for five consecutive years).

This year’s “Best Firms” survey also shed light on industry-wide trends. A few things we noticed: Now, it seems that the top firms are paying more attention to work/life balance than ever before. The historic divide between men’s and women’s satisfaction with compensation appears to have been leveled. And, there seems to be a notable difference in compensation satisfaction levels between junior and more senior consultants.


Making Talent


In The Parable of the Talents, a master gives one servant five talents, another servant two talents, and a third servant one talent before leaving on a trip. When he returns, he finds that the first servant had invested his five talents and made five talents more. The second servant had made two more, and the third servant had buried his one talent for safekeeping and therefore returned his talent to his master.

In response, the master praises the first two servants and gives them both more responsibility. As for the third servant, the master calls him wicked and lazy for not making use of his talent, takes his one talent, and gives it to the first servant, casting the third into darkness. The master preaches, “Everyone who has much will be given more, and whoever has a little, even the little that he has will be taken away.”

The common interpretation is that we are under a moral obligation to use our abilities rather than bury them.

Consulting firms, too, must invest their talent in order to make more talent, or risk losing business. In fact, Steven Kauderer, a managing director and head of the North American Insurance practice at Mercer Oliver Wyman, admits that his firm has been known to “turn down assignments because we didn’t have the right people.”

So, what does it mean to have the right people? Essentially, this means having the best mix of individuals who are able to work together toward a mutual goal: delivering the best to the client. Unlike in the parable, in consulting, teamwork is integral to the success of any project and ultimately that of any firm. In fact, 88 percent of consultants polled expressed the notion that a team-oriented culture is important or very important at their firms. Many firms also expect consultants to have the ability to think creatively. Impressively, at Monitor and Kurt Salmon Associates (KSA), about 95 percent of consultants agreed with the statement, “Creativity is encouraged here, even if it leads to mistakes.”

 
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by John Smith)
    Rating
    I find it inappropriate that Huron Consulting is included in this list. Except for upper management at each office, the vast majority of their workers are temporary hires with no health insurance, low pay, no benefits (unless you include free coffee and federally required breaks as a benefit), and no assurances of long-term work. In fact, workers are asked to work long hours and on weekends and then when the project is over they're booted out the door with a "don't call us, we'll call you" approach. This is a good place to work? Should Huron be sure listed as a top 10 place to work? I don't think so.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by John Smith)
    Rating
    I think it is absurd that Huron Consulting is listed as one of the top 10 places to work. Except for a few upper level management executives at each office, the vast majority of workers are temporary employees with low pay, no health insurance, no benefits (unless you consider free coffee and federally required bathroom breaks a benefit), and no committment to long-term employement. In addition, they ask that you work long hours including weekends but when your project is done, they dismiss you with a "don't call us, we'll call you" attitude. Does that sound like a great place to work? If you are one of the vast majority of workers, probably not.
     
Submit Comment

 CommentPost Comment